Past Meets Present

I track the Healthcare sector. During one of my thousand searches I came across an interesting picture, that I thought is worth sharing. See the picture.

Guess who is being scanned

Guess who is being scanned. Source: HES website

The person being CT scanned is dead and 2,500 years old. Interesting isn’t it. The corpse is an Egyptian mummy which was being examined by radiologists of City University, London. The finding that came out was that the mummy had a “post-mortem fracture of the left thigh bone but her brain was intact and had been left in her body”.

The university intends to “scan historical artefacts such as medieval daggers found embedded in centuries of River Thames mud and a Roman cremation urn too fragile to open”.

Published in: on September 24, 2009 at 12:45 pm  Leave a Comment  
Tags: , ,

Welcome to the Pharma World

I had an opportunity to chat with Anand Bayes over a cup of tea. Anand has built his expertise in the pharma space. He is a MBA (Finance) and a graduate from College of Engineering Pune. Though he has a relentless gaze at PEs and prescriptions forecasts, he was ready to contribute to my blog. Below is shared an interesting insight on the market protection strategies employed by branded and Generic companies. Welcome to the pharma world. Read on….

Q:  Hi Anand! Can you throw some light on the market protection a branded drug gets in your sector?

A:  Hi Ankit! There are two forms of market protection. A) Exclusivity and B) Patent Protection

To understand this let me tell you in brief about the approval process of a new branded drug.

The drug approval process is regulated by Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Consider a branded drug company such as Pfizer or Eli Lilly comes out with a new drug and wants it to get market protection. In such a case it would go to Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and file a New Drug Application (NDA). This NDA contains all the data / statistics from at least their two clinical studies. FDA studies the data and approves or disapproves the drug.

When approved the drug has “Exclusivity” which means that the drug has monopoly in the market for defined number of years (usually 5 years). No new generic variant of the drug can show itself in the market during the period of exclusivity.

The patent protection is another form of market protection for the drug that comes into the market. The time period for patent protection is greater than the “Exclusivity” period ( the average period of patent protection is around 12 years from the time it is launched). In US, the patent protection is granted by the US Patent and Trademark office and listed in the FDA Orange Book. The FDA orange book is an agency publication with all the approved drugs along with all the patents associated with the drug. These patents ensure that no generic versions come to the market before their expiration.

Q:  So a generic variant of the branded drug can not come into the market during the time these protections are present?

A:  One needs to understand that “Exclusivity” protection is by law. So there is no chance for the generic to come into the market during the exclusivity period. But when the exclusivity expires the generic company can challenge the patents of the branded company as invalid, unenforceable or not infringed by the generic company’s product. For this the Generic company files Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) with FDA and gets a Paragraph IV certification. If it prevails in the lawsuit, the generic company is granted 180 days of market exclusivity.

Q:  Does challenging the branded drug patent a viable strategy for the generic companies?

A:  The 180-day exclusivity incentive can be significant for a generic company as it would be the only generic version in the market.   So, it can price the product slightly below the branded version for six months, take market share from the branded product, and maintain its price point before other generics enter the market and erode the price and segment margins. The additional profit for a generic firm can be enormous if the product it challenges is a so-called blockbuster or megabrand

Q: Can you tell us about some recent PIV opportunities?

A: The most famous I can think of is the opportunity with Lipitor which was won by Ranbaxy after years of litigation. Ranbaxy being the first company to file a paragraph IV ANDA for Lipitor, won the 180 days marketing exclusivity starting Nov 2011.

———————x——————————–x——————————x—————————x—————————–

Published in: on August 26, 2009 at 12:27 pm  Leave a Comment  

A Wednesday

No No – I am not writing a review of the film “A Wednesday” but I intend to discuss a more serious and contemplating event that started on “A Wednesday”. This was a Wednesday that saw Mumbai being held hostage by madmen. This was a Wednesday which saw country’s security system fail once again. This was a Wednesday which brought out “again” the utter inability or should I say impotence of the politicians to the fore.


Media has already given it a name 26/11 but this was not a single day event like 9/11. This was when Mumbai was raped, mauled, mutilated continuously for more than 50 hrs. It seemed that it would not end. I was shocked to see the attack persist throughout the day. The shock then took the form of anger. An anger mingled with sorrow for my people who were in the middle of this. My family and friends were worried about me. But all I was thinking like the rest of the mumbaikars was of South Bombay.

Now when the city is breathing again, I am sombre. I am thinking and there are certain opinions, I am beginning to form. First that our politicians are inept at their jobs. They lack administrative skills evident from the slow deployment of NSG on the scene. Second there is a disconnect between our intelligence agency and various security groups otherwise we would not have had so many bombings/ terror attacks in the year. And Third we people fail to learn from our mistakes. We forget and forgive. We will again wake up in the morning and dress up for office. We would again follow the routine. We would again take solace in the “Mumbai Spirit”. We would again be comfortable.


We can not be Gandhiji’s three monkeys. We can not afford to stay mum at this time. We want answers from the government. Why did they let this happen? What are they doing about this? And how would they ensure that this will not happen again? We can not stay blind. We have to be vigilant, eyes wide open staring at the world saying that we are watching and we will reply. We can not stay deaf. We can not let this noise pass into oblivion. Those bullets are still firing in my head. We have to think and react. Till we believe that enough is enough, “A Wednesday” will come and haunt us again.

Published in: on December 8, 2008 at 5:19 am  Comments (4)  
Tags: , , , , , , , ,

What Jim Roger says?

What Jim Roger says?

That America is bankrupt. The American government bonds are a bloating bubble which would burst and the world will see that the bubble had nothing but air.

Why does he says so?

Becuase he feels that the bonds are overvalued. Because America on average has added debt at a rate of 1 billion dollar a year in the past few years and has currently more than 13 trillion dollars in debt.

What I feel ?

That America will continue to pass its debt to its coming generations. And till the time America can cut forests (be its own or of Iraq) to print money, America will not go bankrupt 🙂


Jim Roger Quote (on the bailout of U.S. banks):

“The Bail-out plan is a disaster. In 1929 we had a recession but after the government interfered, it became a depression. You should not interfere.”

Source: EuroBench.com


Published in: on November 20, 2008 at 7:03 am  Comments (1)  
Tags: , , ,

Sachin “God” Tendulkar

Sachin Ramesh Tendulkar

Nick Name

: Little Master / Tendlya / God

Born

: 24th April 1973, Mumbai, Maharashtra

Batting Style

: Right Hand Bat

Bowling Style

: Right Arm Medium, Right Arm Off Break / Leg Break / Googly

Test Debut

: India Vs Pakistan at National Stadium, Karachi, 1st Test, 1989/90

ODI Debut

: India Vs Pakistan at Municipal Stadium, Gujranwala, 2nd ODI, 1989/90

Twenty 20 International Debut

: South Africa Vs India, Only T20 at New Wanderers Stadium, Johannesburg, 2006/07

Height

: 5 ft 5 in

Education

: Sharadashram Vidyamandir School

“Every now and again, a player appears on the scene who will change the way the game is played.” – That is Sachin Tendulkar for you. This RBS commercial rightly defines the impact Sachin Tendulkar aka God has had on the Gentlemen’s game. No batsman other than Sachin has ever been spoken in the same breath as Sir Don Bradman.

Gods descend on the cricket field when the little master is in form. Those back-foot punches through the cover, slashing square cuts and leg glances are a delight to watch. It was said that when Sachin hits a square cut, the ball reaches the boundary even before you could say his name. The bowlers could not help but stare with awe when they are hit with such panache.

His century as a 19 year old against Australia at WACA is termed as one of the best innings ever to be played in Australia. I can not forget the Semi final and Finals against Australia in Sharjah or his 136 against Pakistan in the test match in Chennai. Also cherished is the century when Sachin curbed his natural instinct to play on the off side in the test against Australia as the ball was seaming viciously. He has been the leading run scorer in the 1996 and the 2003 World Cups. The list of his heroics is endless because he has scored more than 40 centuries in both Test and ODIs. He has enthralled us by scoring more than 28000 runs, combined in Tests and ODIs.

This gentleman is now more than 35 years old and has played for almost 19 years. All these years have taken a toll on his body and people are now taking names to fill his space. The maestro may himself decide to retire when he feels its right. Whenever that happens, his aura will always remain. Indian Cricket will always be indebted to Sachin. He will forever be the most revered cricketer in the world. I consider him as one of the Gems of Indian cricket.

Batting and fielding averages

Mat

Inns

NO

Runs

HS

Ave

BF

SR

100

50

4s

6s

Ct

Tests

154

252

26

12273

248*

54.30

40

51

47

100

ODIs

417

407

38

16361

186*

44.33

19137

85.49

42

89

1785

166

122

T20Is

1

1

0

10

10

10.00

12

83.33

0

0

2

0

1

First-class

254

400

41

21036

248*

58.59

66

97

167

List A

504

492

52

19913

186*

45.25

53

107

157

Twenty20

12

12

1

386

69

35.09

296

130.40

0

3

56

7

8

Bowling averages

Mat

Inns

Balls

Runs

Wkts

BBI

BBM

Ave

Econ

SR

4w

5w

Tests

154

126

3880

2227

42

3/10

3/14

53.02

3.44

92.3

0

0

ODIs

417

265

8009

6795

154

5/32

5/32

44.12

5.09

52.0

4

2

T20Is

1

1

15

12

1

1/12

1/12

12.00

4.80

15.0

0

0

First-class

254

7239

4116

67

3/10

61.43

3.41

108.0

0

List A

504

10185

8423

201

5/32

5/32

41.90

4.96

50.6

4

2

Twenty20

12

4

57

65

2

1/12

1/12

32.50

6.84

28.5

0

0

Stats Source: cricinfo as on 14th November, 2008


Published in: on November 14, 2008 at 9:43 am  Comments (3)  
Tags: , , , , , ,

Financial Statement Treatments of Subsidiary, Joint Venture and an Associate

Subsidiary

What is a Subsidiary?

Subsidiary is an investee company when the shares held in it by the investor company gives the investor company a control of more than 50% of the votes and thus the control over the board of directors of the investee company. Such an influence by the investor company is termed as “Dominant influence / control”.

What is the treatment of a subsidiary in the financial statement?

When a subsidiary is incorporated the effect in balance sheet is seen as follows. The investment costs increase in the balance sheet – Asset side of the investor (one can also now call it a group company). This would be balanced by the share capital and the pre-acquisition reserves of the subsidiary. The consolidated value of Assets and Liabilities is then found out which represents the value of the resources controlled by the group.

But what about the portion of the subsidiary held by people outside the group? By taking the consolidated value of Assets and Liabilities in the group BS, aren’t we skewing the BS as the group only owns some percentage (> 50%) of the total assets and the rest belongs to some other stake holders?

Yes this indeed will skew the BS and thus we incorporate the line item “Minority interest” which reflects the portion of the subsidiary held by people outside the group.The Book Value of Equity of the parent company seen alone excludes the equity held by minorities. But to balance the Total Assets, Minority Interest is included as a separate line item below the Shareholder’s Equity. Now the BS is balanced. 🙂

Are there any other treatments?

The revenues, EBITDA, Net Debt etc will be consolidated. The Net income of the group will exclude the portion held by minorities. This will be shown as Minority Interest in the income statement.

For Eg:

There are two companies A and B. A is a 100 % owned subsidiary and B is an 80 % owned subsidiary.

Company

Revenue (in Rs ‘000s)

EBITDA (‘000s)

Net Income (‘000s)

Net Debt (‘000s)

Book Value of Equity (‘000s)

A

100

50

30

50

50

B

100

50

30

50

50

Group

200

100

60-0.2×30 = 54

100

100-0.2×50 = 90

Associate

What is an Associate?

When the control of the investor company is such that it owns more than 20% but less than 50% of the shares of a company (investee) then the investee company is said to be an associate of the investor company. This gives the investor company a “Significant Influence / Control” over the associate.

What is the treatment of an associate in the financial statement?

The treatment of an associate is referred to as “One Liner” treatment. In this treatment the interest in the associate is reported as a single line on the balance sheet of the group. For e.g you may find line items like “Investments in associates”  on the Asset side of the balance sheet of the group company. Thus only the share of the group in Associate is recorded on the balance sheet.

Joint venture

What is a Joint Venture?

A joint venture is an investee which is under the joint control of two or more investees.. It is a startegic alliance between two or more companies which contribute resources and share revenues along with the control they exhibit over the JV. This treatment is similar to that of an Associate.

Published in: on November 3, 2008 at 1:11 pm  Leave a Comment  
Tags: , ,